
Cam-shot of sun viewed on March 12, 2012 PHOTO: NASA SOHO
“How is the SUN triggering many earth changes?
“More than any other major co-factor, the unprecedented, meteoric and relentless changes taking place throughout Planet Earth are the direct result of exceedingly powerful influences emanating from the presiding star of our solar system. The sun, and especially its recent and extraordinary activity, is at the very heart of every major geophysical and meteorological event taking place around the globe today.”
Altogether a far-reaching and encompassing perspective on the influence of the sun on planet earth and on controversial theories like “dark matter.”
< Read the complete article by Anthony Michael posted on April 23, 2012 at marketoracle.co.uk. >
link submitted by Frieda Nelson
Below find a brief scientific commentary on the article by Stephan Fuelling. And below that, a comment on Stephan’s comment and a link to the discussion of dark matter from the thunderbolts group, proponents of the electric universe theory:
Stephan Fuelling: “The whole thing [electric universe theory] lacks robust scientific evidence. Since the sun spews out plasma continuously, it would immediately neutralize any charge build-up in our solar system. The article cites some scientific work related to currents in the upper atmosphere of the earth or other planets that follow magnetic field lines (Birkland currents). These can carry large currents but the forces that are produced by these currents are negligible in comparison to the planet’s gravitational force. To then extrapolate this and put this on a cosmological scale is in my opinion ridiculous. Then one has to remember that most of these are dipole forces, like in a magnet, they dissipate with the 4th order of the distance versus the 2nd order for the gravitational force. And on average, these dipole forces from plasma currents should become zero anyway. There is, for example, no significant contribution of the sun’s magnetic force upon the earth’s orbit. The orbit is solely determined by the gravitational force, otherwise our planet would change its orbit drastically with the sun’s cycle – which it doesn’t. Since we do not observe any such force within our solar system, the much weaker density of plasma and weaker magnetic fields outside of our solar system cannot account for effects that are attributed to ‘dark matter’ and the ‘dark force’. We don’t know yet what these are, maybe our understanding about the forces of nature are incomplete but one does not have to jump to ridiculous theories.
“One explanation for dark matter that is not main-stream and that I know of is that dark matter is hydrogen in a ‘sub-state’, called ‘hydrino’, named by Dr. Randell Mills from Blacklight Power. It does not radiate, it would only interact via gravity or act kinetically as an inert gas. If it would accumulate around the sun or be ‘swallowed’ by the sun, it may (re-)convert into normal hydrogen or hydrogen plasma, therefore this hydrino form of dark matter would completely escape detection! However, as fantastic as the theory from Dr. Mills sounds, there are many scientists that have attacked Mills because of bad science. Maybe his theoretical approach is incorrect but the existence of ‘hydrinos’ could explain cold fusion and also dark matter. So time will tell! But I wouldn’t hold my breath. . .”
Robert Anderson: “Stephan is speaking as a trained scientist. As for non-robust science, hypotheses like “hydrinos” are completely “made up”; a speculation on what dark matter “might be; there’s no robust scientific proof. Here is a link to the Thunderbolts site that may be helpful.”