“Scientist Proves DNA Can Be Reprogrammed by Words and Frequencies”
PHOTO: collective-evolution.com
“HUMAN DNA IS A BIOLOGICAL INTERNET and superior in many aspects to the artificial one. Russian scientific research directly or indirectly explains phenomena such as clairvoyance, intuition, spontaneous and remote acts of healing, self healing, affirmation techniques, unusual light/auras around people (namely spiritual masters), mind’s influence on weather patterns and much more. In addition, there is evidence for a whole new type of medicine in which DNA can be influenced and reprogrammed by words and frequencies WITHOUT cutting out and replacing single genes.”
In this article by Grazyna Fosar and Franz Bludorf there isn’t much in the way of citations, and that is always a problem when an author wants to be taken seriously. But that doesn’t mean that the article can’t be food for thought. Four serious Cosolargist thinkers have responded to this article’s topic with thoughtful commentaries. Read the article online, then read their commentaries, then add a comment yourself!
< Read the entire article at Collective-Evolution.com. >
link submitted by Frieda Nelson
Commentary by Ron Theriault:
This essay appears to be a summary of a book that unfortunately is currently available only in German. The book’s focus seems to be how certain Russian researchers are discovering scientific evidence for various New Age spiritual ideas.
It begins with the assertion that human DNA can be altered by thoughts and words, and that “junk” DNA has a syntax that mirrors human language among other things. It then goes on to mention “Indigo children” which is the New Age term for those born with enhanced clairvoyant abilities, and something called “vacuum domains,” which are said to be a physical phenomenon responsible for many UFO reports. I’ll just address my comments to the DNA content of the essay however.
When the chemical structure of DNA was first worked out, researchers soon discovered that certain clearly marked regions of DNA contained coded sequences that specify the structures of proteins. Many thought that the workings of living cells would soon be discovered, even though these protein coding sections only amounted to a small fraction of the total amount of DNA in a cell. The rest was called “junk” DNA, because it was thought that it had no purpose.
That point of view now seems hopelessly naive. How could any cell function if it just carried on making proteins willy-nilly? It is now known that the “junk” DNA (also called non-coding DNA) plays an important role in controlling which sections of DNA are active and which are passive. It is likely in my view to be processed like the instructions that comprise a computer program, and if so, probably consists of the most complex and convoluted “spaghetti code” imaginable.
The term “spaghetti code” is used in the software world to denote the convoluted and disorganized nature of the instructions that make up badly written computer programs. Ideally one wants to have to make a change in only one place in a computer program in order to make one change in its behavior. With spaghetti code, one simple change may have many effects that are unrelated to what is desired. Macroscopic evidence for cellular spaghetti code can be seen in the results of plant and animal breeders, who always have to deal with secondary effects when a desired characteristic is bred for.
The thing that stood out most prominently for me in the essay was the mention of the research of Russian biologist Pjotr Garjajev. It was stated that DNA patterns impressed on laser light from one organism can influence the development of the embryo of another organism. If confirmed, this could be the beginning of an important new technology.
The assertion in the essay that human speech influences DNA because the structure of DNA is similar to the grammar of human languages is questionable on a couple counts. Firstly the grammar, or structure of human languages is not universal. The grammars of Asian languages versus Indo-European languages are vastly different, lending credence to the view that grammar consists of speech patterns that become habits and then cultural artifacts over time. There is no doubt that DNA is structured, and that there are discernible patterns to that structure, but by this reasoning it would be equally valid to say that the structure of DNA resembles the Lisp programming language. * (EDITOR: The reference to Lisp should not be taken too literally. There is nothing special about Lisp that resembles DNA. It was simply pulled out of the air as an example of a non-human language which of course, has a structure. The author could have equally chosen another example of something that has structure, say, “a customer relations software suite”or “the bureaucracy that runs the department of health and human services.”)
Secondly, the essay makes no mention of intention. It should be well known to New Agers especially that human intention is a key factor, if not the most important one, in effecting healing, clairvoyance, and other goals that are currently beyond scientific understanding. Intention, like consciousness, is beyond language and any other physical phenomena, and must surely rank as one of the great mysteries of our time.
The web page skims the surface of a number of interesting topics, but offers little in the way of practical advice or exploration of any consequences. Hopefully the book itself does better.
Ron Theriault
April 15, 2013
Commentary by Stephan Fuelling:
I agree with everything that Ron commented; nice review, Ron!
There is one other thing that came to mind, which is both fascinating and hard to understand. It is called the Ciba-Geigy effect:
http://blog.hasslberger.com/docs/CIBA_PATENTED_TECHNOLOGY.pdf
Here, seeds or fish eggs were grown in an electrostatic field and the grown plants or fish showed features from extinct species! Here clearly the DNA was manipulated through the presence of an electric field—or (which was not mentioned, but is something that I theorize) from the electrostatic POTENTIAL the seeds are exposed to. I had done some experiments with sleeping on an electric potential with regard to grounding. A negative potential of 27 Volts gave me nightmares, a friend replicated this with a 100 Volts negative potential and had the worst nightmares of his life! The positive potential, in most cases, did not change the sleep but if the bed place was compromised by ‘noxious energies’, a small positive potential of 9 Volts mitigated that problem. But one cannot exclude that the electric field was responsible here, since those would have been present as well.
Magnets or magnetic fields have also a healing effect. I am experimenting with a pulsed magnetic device ‘Earth Pulse’ and videos from the manufacturer’s website shows remarkable recovery of a Parkinson’s patient and the age regression (or youth sustaining) effect on the manufacturer’s own dog ‘Gizmo’. Interesting to watch:
http://www.earthpulsetechnologies.com/ For the videos, click on “Videos.”
Since thought processes may involve the Bohm-Aharanov effect (modulation of the phase of an electron wave), where the potential of the magnetic field is responsible, and I think that the potentials (both for the magnetic and electric fields) are primary while the fields are mathematical derivatives of the potential, it stands to reason that the potentials may be causing the biological effects, regarding the DNA modification and health effects. The electric field would only act on the surface of the seeds or the eggs, since even the smallest conductivity would short out the internal electric fields (in a short time). This is only true for static electric fields. So the DNA should not be affected by it. Dr. Karl Maret is also very interested in the magnetic vector potential, when I talked with him during the Convocation last year.
With best regards,
Stephan
Commentary by Gary Buchanan:
My thoughts are that, yes, DNA can obviously be influenced by all kinds of wave fronts, e.g., light, sound, EM [electromagnetism], et alia [among other things].
A great many alternative physicians and researchers are working in this field; for example, at Energy Medicine Exchange, Biofield Scientists, etc. online, and with myriad links, footnotes, case studies, etc.
Side effects are seldom discussed, but should be. This ties-in with the “spaghetti” [code] idea that Ron mentions [above]. There is no such thing as “junk” DNA. It is all there for a reason—and used in ways people cannot even begin to imagine.
This is, in my opinion, why schools of solar adepts have always been strict [about] and very conscious of proper techniques and approaches in using sunlight, as well as related subtle energy sources, such as sound. From our teachings we know that the DNA definitely can be influenced and modified with Information Factors contained in sunlight—but also in phonon formations, water, air, aethers, etc.
Accordingly, mantra and vocalizations, also intent—but not always essential, absolutely do affect absorption of light patterning, encoded fields, and this is why we use singing bowls, chants, bells, et alia in services, e.g., at sunrise, but at other times, as well. It has little to do with “linguistics,” per se. Again, in my opinion, all languages derive from common ancestors, globally (e.g., Sanskrit from Urdu, Irish from Sanskrit, Chinese from same ancient sources, etc.); but, this is not at all relevant to the discussion.
Reverend Gene [Savoy] Sr. used to say that our “wave front” technology must be handled, discussed, and made available in a very careful manner. (This is why we trade-marked [the term] “wave front bioresonance.”) Folks have all sorts of simplistic, potentially dangerous, ideas on how to use these energies and IF [information factors] (the article stating some of the more shallow understandings), but few have the personal experience of The System, the effects and ultimate goals envisioned.
Sound is vibration and responsible for ALL life on the physical levels—also very much on the astral and psychic levels, for certain.
Phonon chains in the body and its fields, in addition to rapid Cymatic drive trains, produce bosons and solitons, and speed up all kinds of functions, including the resonances of the 4th-phase vicinal [in the body] waters ([see the work of] Gerald Pollack), cells, the DNA, RNA, sub-atomic spins, ad infinitum.
The DNA spiral has been shown many times to vibrate with certain, quite specific, frequencies and combined resonances, both acoustic (pressure waves) and EM; i.e., lights and color. The very design of the bio-resonant spirals, following acoustical Golden Mean, etc., demonstrate that they may be altered, mutated, and reorganized with sacred geometric patterns—sound, imagery, light, subtle torsions, etc.
The Niels Bohr Institute has for several decades been documenting this reality with its R & D, and [renowned biophysicist] Jim Oschman just wrote several pages in my new book’s preface agreeing with this primary principle in therapies—saying he now rejects EM approaches in medicine, per se. For example, solitons can produce biophotons (perceived as EM), strengthening the light fields, altering genetic flows and patterning. All that is required to create this effect is a particular resonance, e.g., a good voice sounding a phoneme.
A strong underpinning in Sonatherapy is this obvious principle of vibrational effect—all of which I have attempted to scientifically document in my two books. Not to be cute here, but if one HAS READ and comprehended those books, he/she might find these occasional articles [such as the one reviewed here] a bit amusing, while also realizing how misinformed and na ve the writers are.
Unfortunately, I believe posting such articles and reviews on our web site does more harm to our image than good. It makes us look like amateur speculators rather than adepts—those who are supposed to know and understand these things intimately—and therefore “the source” that should be consulted and supported, the School [of Light; i.e., the Jamilian University] with whom one should enroll and study.
Gary Buchanan
April 15, 2013
Commentary by Robert Anderson:
I want to just reiterate and thus emphasize Dr. Buchanan’s final point: These articles simply show that some in the scientific world are starting to dabble in what has from time immemorial been the domain of the spiritual arts and sciences, and while those articles are related to what Cosolargists do, the latter, as adherents to a proven System, gain experiences that enable the practitioner to not only have this knowledge but to use it skillfully (“adept-ly”) for self and cosmic evolution: the ultimate goal of all true science. In other words, if you find this article intriguing, then study (nay, live) the way of the Cosolargist and find out for yourself.
Bob Anderson
19 April 2013
